Oct 23

Since everyone else is talking about it, I figured I’d throw my opinion into the ring.

So Jo Rowling announces that Dumbledore is gay, which explains a lot about the Grindelwald story, which I found a bit confusing.

My guess is that Rowling has always known that DD was homosexual, but she just forgot to mention it. Either she thought it’d be obvious to the reader, or she just didn’t realize that she hadn’t explicitly mentioned it in the 1,000s of pages that make up the seven books of the Harry Potter series.

That said, I’m sad that this will give the crazies more ammunition against the books. Witches and hexes and homos….oh my!

What do y’all think?

BTW, What the Hell? has a much more thoughtful analysis of DD’s sexuality from her unique Pixie Dyke pov.

Jul 26

I’ve been writing for work. Sometimes I make the crazy mistake of thinking I can produce two well-researched, well-written business profiles in two part-time working days. I did it, but I’m concerned about the double “well” part. Guess that’s why I have an editor (thanks, K, for putting up with me!). Which brings me to J.K. Rowling.

I have thoroughly enjoyed the magical world that Rowling has created and sustained and expanded on over 1000s of pages. That said, while reading the fourth book, I started asking the question: “Where the heck is her editor?” I asked again during the the fifth and sixth novels. Especially the fifth, which, in my opinion, gets bogged down, and dare I say it, close to dull, in the middle. How much of Sirius Black’s family history do we really need to know?

My guess is that once Rowling got really, really famous and really, really rich, someone said: “Oh, she’s a great writer. We don’t need to edit her. Let her write 800 or more pages, 150 of which could be cut, because, well, the book will sell anyway. Oh, and the longer the book, the higher the asking price.”

And Rowling, who is a good writer with a GREAT imagination, and who, because she toiled for months and months over every paragraph she wrote, probably thought: “Great. I don’t have to cut anything. I can leave all my backstory, flights of fancy, and random character development in the novel.”

I know this opinion may seem blasphemous to some of you who love every detail of Rowlings’ world. But in my humble writers’ opinion, EVERYONE needs an editor. I run everything I write for publication through E-spouse and at least one other writer/editor friend before sending it to my “real” editor. Even then, errors sometimes get through. And in a novel of over 700 pages, a couple typos are to be expected (I’ve found two so far. Anyone else?). But a bit of cutting here and there could smooth the flow of the novels, particularly those hefty in the middle ones.

That said, I do think Number Seven is the best written book of the series. One of the great covenants that Rowling has made with her readers is that she assumes we’re on the journey with her. Well, perhaps a bit behind her since she probably finished writing Number Seven about a year ago. But I love that in this novel, she doesn’t waste too much time explaining, she dives right in (although there is quite a bit of scene setting in the first two chapters before we get to rocking chapter three).

I also think it’s remarkable how many adults love her books. I had a ten-minute conversation about Number Seven with an 11-year-old boy yesterday. I don’t know if I’ve ever had a conversation that long with an 11-year-old boy. At least where the boy actually wanted to talk to me.

So, some of this can get us started on the non-spoiler convo. I was seduced by the lovely Di into drinking beers at Usual Suspects last night, so I’m not quite finished yet (page 608). Next week, when more folks have finished Number Seven, we can have the spoiler convo. Dive in!

Jul 25

And you?

I’ll have some scintillating no-spoiler commentary on the novel later today or tomorrow.

Happy Wodin’s day!

Jul 20

In awe of the last Harry Potter book
A mom and her kids look in awe at the last installment of J.K. Rowling’s series of Harry Potter books. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” went on sale at midnight, and hundreds of Ashvegas residents filled bookstores to snap up their copy and begin reading. This family bought their copy of the book at Books-a-Million.

Jul 20

I’m too tired to go stand in line at midnight tonight, but I’ll hit the 10:00 a.m. Potter par-tay at Accent on Books tomorrow, with the fam in tow.

Here are my predictions. These are not spoilers. I don’t yet have the novel, and although I can’t wait to start reading it, the truth is that I won’t have time to read the entire 742 pages in the space of a couple of days, and thus, the ending will prolly be spoiled for me.

But for the record, here are my predictions of the outcome of the novel.

1. Harry won’t die. Killing him off doesn’t end the possibility of future resurrection, as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle discovered when he tried to do away with Sherlock and Watson.

2. Voldemort will be vanquished, finally, by Harry, with help from Snape, double agent extraordinaire, and by far the most interesting character in the series. Snape, however, will be killed in the final battle with Voldy.

What are your predictions?

Feb 5

Warning: partial nudity. Of a 17-year-old.